Monday, February 8, 2016
Who has actually seen this movie?
After reading the three different interpretations of gender from authors
Kornhaber, Garber, and Gilbert I would say Kornhaber had the strongest
evidence. Although I had a bit of a difficult time following the scenes they
were describing for I have never seen the film, Kornhaber had the deepest
analysis. Unlike Gilbert who claimed, “It’s a movie that celebrates the fact that it doesn’t want to make you
think—there’s nothing to pick apart in the car ride on the way home…” Kornhaber points out the underlying politics
involved in the movie Magic Mike XXL. Kornhaber states, “Between the Mike franchise and 50
Shades of Grey, we’re watching the formation of a
would-be-blockbuster genre, one that celebrates and profits from the sexual
appetites of people other than straight men.” Sex scenes, nudity, and women are
portrayed in countless movies. What makes Magic Mike XXL unique is the appeal
to women that it has.. Male strippers are now the ones being objectified.
Kornhaber provides the strongest evidence by supporting his claims with scenes in
the movie. For example, he claims that the men in the movie are not afraid of
being labeled as feminine. He then provides support by explaining how violence
(the punch to the face) was looked down upon while talking about their feelings
were encouraged. On the otherhand, Gilbert had the weakest evidence. She
states, “In a cultural landscape where we’re continually obliged to dissect
things by going over them ad infinitum, it’s pretty refreshing to have a movie
that’s so seemingly free of nuance.” She doesn’t go into
detail of the politics involved in this movie. Her point of view is
light-hearted. I also want to mention that in Garber’s article she talks of the
women characters in the movie and states, “you could see her as being, like so many other women in this movie,
simply a kind of object; you could also see her “performance” in that show,
though, as the film’s acquiescence to her wishes.” I feel this is contradictory because the male
strippers are also constantly being objectified every time they perform.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I have never seen any of the Magic Mike movies so, for me, it was a little hard to get the full grasp of the three articles. I didn’t understand any of the movie references but I think, for the most part, I got a feel of what the 3 articles were trying to say. I disagree with how you said Gilbert does not think it makes you think? I don’t think I worded that correctly. Anyway, I think Gilbert is trying to make the point that this movie appeals to women for the fact that the main characters are doing more than just sexually appealing to women with their bodies, but also with their mindsets. She talks about how Mike talks about his God being a woman, and Ken tells a married women she is desirable and should have love made to her with the lights on. Gilbert says, “…the sense throughout that female contentment and pleasure is the ultimate goal makes it infinitely more engaging.” Now I feel as though I can’t really take a side with the three writers because I’ve never seen the movie, I didn’t even know that they made a second Magic Mike, I’m basing my argument solely on what I am reading in this article.
ReplyDelete